Abstract
Radiographic contrast media are commonly used diagnostic aids to improve imaging, e.g. in computerized tomography. However, the routine application of these agents may cause adverse allergic/pseudoallergic reactions. In order to understand more completely the underlying mechanisms involved in these reactions, experiments on histamine release both in vivo and in vitro are necessary. Using canine mast cell suspensions from lung and liver, we have investigated the histamine release caused by six commonly used preparations. The dog is an ideal model for both in vitro and in vivo studies not only by virtue of its size but also because of its similarity to man with respect to e.g. cardiovascular reactions after drug-induced histamine release. The two non-ionic preparations (Solutrast, Ultravist) released little histamine from both cell types (ca. 4-6%). The ionic contrast media (Angiographin, Hexabrix, Telebrix, Rayvist) dose-dependently released histamine from the liver cells and pulmonary cells (maximum release between 18-35%). The liver cells (the liver is the shock organ in the dog) reacted more strongly to these agents than the pulmonary cells, thus providing further evidence for mast cell heterogeneity and the importance of selecting the appropriate mast cell model for the investigation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.