Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the risk for cancers of A-bomb survivors in the ongoing life span study (LSS) with unexposed groups consisting of the entire populations of Hiroshima prefecture and neighboring Okayama prefecture. The subjects consisted of the Hiroshima group reported in LSS report 12 (LSS-H group) and a control group (the entire populations of Hiroshima and Okayama-HPCG and OPCG, respectively). We estimated the expected number of deaths due to all causes and to cancers of various causes among the exposed survivors of the Hiroshima bombing in the LSS report 12 who died in the follow-up interval at ages similar to those of people in Hiroshima and Okayama prefectures who were aged 0-34 years at the time of the bombing in 1945. We compared the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of the LSS-H group to that of the HPCG and OPCG (SMR-H and SMR-O, respectively). Even at low and very low dose categories, the SMR-H and SMR-O were significantly high for all deaths, all cancers, solid cancers, and liver cancers in male subjects, and for uterus and liver cancers in female subjects, respectively. The results show that, if the dose estimations of the dosimetry system 1986 (DS86) are correct, there are significantly increased risks of cancer among even survivors exposed to the very low dose level. The dose assumptions of DS86 have been criticized for underestimating doses in areas distant from the hypocenter. The contribution of residual radiation, ignored in LSS, and that of neutrons, underestimated by DS86, is suggested to be fairly high.

Highlights

  • The life span study (LSS) conducted by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF) is an epidemiological investigation of deaths among people exposed to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombs

  • The dose assumptions of dosimetry system 1986 (DS86) have been criticized for underestimating doses in areas distant from the hypocenter

  • The standardized mortality ratio (SMR)-H and SMR-O for solid cancers among males were significantly high in all dose categories and increased with the radiation dose

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The life span study (LSS) conducted by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF) is an epidemiological investigation of deaths among people exposed to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombs. The residual radiation that the entire LSS group may have been exposed to was excluded from the general analysis of the LSS. For this reason, it is intrinsically difficult to examine the level of the exposure risk based on residual radiation. All LSS reports after report 8 have estimated the risk of radiation exposure among A-bomb survivors using regression analyses. These analyses, did not show the results for A-bomb survivors in comparison with an unexposed group (NIC; not in the city at the time of bombing) [4]. These analyses, did not show the results for A-bomb survivors in comparison with an unexposed group (NIC; not in the city at the time of bombing) [4]. (LSS reports use the term ‘‘unexposed group’’, but this category of survivors was exposed to very low-dose primary radiation.)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call