Hippocampal subregion‐specific proteomic differences between Alzheimer disease (AD) and primary age‐related tauopathy (PART)

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAlthough Alzheimer disease (AD) and primary age‐related tauopathy (PART) both harbor 3R/4R‐tau immunopositive Alzheimer‐type neurofibrillary degeneration, they differ in the spatial development of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in the hippocampus. PART displays an early predilection for neurofibrillary degeneration in the CA2 subregion of the hippocampus, whereas AD typically develops NFTs in the entorhinal cortex and CA1 subregion initially (Figures 1‐2).MethodUsing Nanostring’s GeoMx™ Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP), we compared hippocampal subregion protein expression differences between AD and PART. The DSP panel allows for spatial analysis of the level of expression of 73 different proteins in multiple regions of interest (ROIs) on formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded sections. Our ROIs were NFT‐bearing neurons and non‐NFT‐bearing neurons in the entorhinal cortex, CA1 and CA2 hippocampal subregions, as well as the neuronal microenvironments in these regions.ResultAnalyses identified several proteins displaying differential expression in tangle‐bearing neurons when comparing AD to PART. These included higher levels of synaptic and neuronal markers in PART, such as Synaptophysin, MAP2, Calbindin and NRGN, as well as higher levels of proteins involved in degradation pathways, such as CTSD, GPNMB, Park7 and FUS. PART also displayed higher levels of Neprilysin in CA2, and higher IDE in CA1, which are proteins that help degrade β‐amyloid (Figure 3). Many of these proteins were also differentially expressed in the non‐tangle bearing neurons. In addition, AD demonstrated higher levels of p‐tau T231, S214, S199, and S396 in non‐tangle bearing neurons of CA1, as well as higher expression of Aβ1‐40. In the microenvironment, NEFL, NRGN, CLEC7a, GPNMB, and CTSD were higher in PART, while p‐tau S396 and BACE1 were higher in AD.ConclusionIn conclusion, PART cases displayed higher levels of neuronal and synaptic markers, suggesting better maintenance of neuronal and synaptic integrity than AD, as well as higher levels of proteins important for degradation of detrimental proteins. AD cases expressed higher levels of certain p‐tau epitopes, especially in and around CA1 non‐tangle bearing neurons. In addition, AD displayed higher levels of BACE1, whereas PART displayed higher levels of CTSD, Neprilysin and IDE, which could explain the differences in β‐amyloid deposition in these cases.