Hip arthroscopy versus total hip arthroplasty-A study on patients with obesity above 40 years of age.

Abstract

Patients older than 40 years with a body-mass-index (BMI) >30 kg/m2 , a femoroacetabular-impingement (FAI) and little cartilage damage are a challenge for hip surgeons. Hip-arthroscopy (HAS) or conservative therapy until a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is needed are possible treatments. Our research purpose was to compare the clinical results and complication/reoperation rate after HAS and THA in patients with obesity over 40 years. This retrospective study includes a consecutive series of patients with obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2 ) who underwent HAS (19 hips) and THA (37 hips) over 40 years of age between 2007 and 2013 at our institution with a minimum of 12-months follow-up. Outcome measures were WOMAC (Western Ontario und McMaster Universities Arthritis Index), subjective-hip-value (SHV), residual complaints and the reoperation rate. Patient data and scores were collected pre-operative, 12 months post-operatively and at the last follow-up. Both groups showed a comparable age (mean 48 years). Regarding SHV-Scores the THA-group shows continuous significant improvements. Reaching 87% (range 50%-100%), the HAS-group showed in case of the SHV no significant change after 1 year and an improvement from preoperative to the last follow-up reaching 72% (range 30%-100%) at the last follow-up. Residual groin pain was significant higher in the HAS-group. Two deep infections (5.4%) requiring reoperations were reported in the THA-group. The conversion rate to THA after a mean time of 60 months was 26% (5 of 19). Patients with obesity over 40 years demonstrated inferior SHV, more often residual pain and revision surgery after HAS, when compared to THA at short-term, with conversions rate of one fourth. However, THA in this patient group showed high infection rate of 5%. This information is relevant for counselling above-mentioned patients.