Abstract
The LHCb collaboration has recently presented their result on R_K = BR(B+ -> K+ mu+ mu-)/ BR(B+ -> K+ e+ e-) for the dilepton invariant mass bin m_{ll}^2 = 1-6 GeV^2 (l = mu, e). The measurement shows an intriguing 2.6 sigma deviation from the Standard Model (SM) prediction. In view of this, we study model independent New Physics (NP) explanations of R_K consistent with other measurements involving b -> s l l transition, relaxing the assumption of lepton universality. We perform a Bayesian statistical fit to the NP Wilson Coefficients and compare the Bayes Factors of the different hypotheses in order to quantify their goodness-of-fit. We show that the data slightly favours NP in the muon sector over NP in the electron sector.
Highlights
≈ 0.07 and that the NP in C7 is severely constrained by the measured branching ratio of B → Xsγ, the expression of RK can be approximated by, C1S0M + C1μ0 + C1μ0 2 + C9SM + C9μ + C9μ 2 RK ≈ C1S0M + C1e0 + C1e0 2 + C9SM + C9e + C9e 2
This simplified expression clearly shows that the theoretical error in RK is very small even in the presence of NP
We took the theoretical error into account by taking a gaussian prior for a parameter called b0 and marginalizing over it, with its central value and standard deviation given by 15.86 and 1.51 respectively
Summary
We have used the data for B(B+ → K+μ+μ−) only in the low-q2 bin 1 − 6 GeV2, the main reason being that a resonance structure in the dilepton invariant mass distribution was observed around m2μ μ = 17.3 GeV2 by the LHCb collaboration last year [26]. This means that even though form factors in the high-q2 region were recently computed from lattice QCD [27,28,29,30], the theoretical prediction for this observable is affected by non-factorisable hadronic uncertainties. We expect a shift of the best fit points in the direction of the SM values, since these extra measurements are generally in good agreement with the SM predictions
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.