Abstract
The Hill repair for gastroesophageal reflux disease, though effective, durable, and in some regards a superior repair, has unfortunately seen less widespread adoption in the laparoscopic era relative to Nissen and Toupet fundoplications. Some purported objections to the Hill repair include conceptual and technical barriers, need for intraoperative manometry, and lack of clear-cut advantages. However, it has proven to be remarkably durable at 20 years and beyond relative to other repairs, with a low side-effect profile; there are also unique applications of the Hill repair and Hill sutures which broaden one’s armamentarium for managing the spectrum of patients with reflux disease. Lastly, understanding its anatomic components strengthens the surgeon’s knowledge of the anatomy and function of the gastroesophageal junction and antireflux repairs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Foregut: The Journal of the American Foregut Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
