Abstract
In modern form, Hilbert's Theorem 90 tells us that R 1ε ∗( G m)=0 , where ε : X e ́ t →X zar is the canonical map between the étale site and the Zariski site of a scheme X. I construct examples showing that the corresponding statement for algebraic spaces does not hold.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
