Abstract

The inner product spaces ℂ n and l 2 share a further convenient property: informally speaking, any sequence in either of these spaces which looks convergent is convergent. To see what this means, recall the inner product space l 0 of Example 2.7. We saw there a sequence ( x k ) converging in l 2 but not in l 0 . If we tried to carry out all our analysis in l 0 this phenomenon would definitely complicate matters: it would be like trying to do real analysis in ℚ instead of ℝ. Let us formulate the requirement of the existence of limits. Definition Let ( M,d ) be a metric space. A sequence ( x k ) in M is a Cauchy sequence if, for every e > 0, there exists an integer k 0 such that k,l ≥ k 0 implies that d ( x k ,x l ) ( M,d ) is a complete metric space if every Cauchy sequence in M converges to a limit in M . Thus ℝ is a complete metric space with respect to its natural metric. So also is ℝ, for if ( z k ) is a Cauchy sequence in ℂ, then (Re z k ) and (Im z k ) are Cauchy sequences in ℝ. They thus have limits x,y ∈ℝ, and we have z k → x + i y in ℂ. Theorem ℂ n (for n ∈ℕ) and l 2 are complete metric spaces. We recall our convention that metric terminology refers to the metric determined by the norm according to Theorem 2.3 for an inner product space.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call