High‐Temperature Rate Constants for H + Tetramethylsilane and H + Silane and Implications about Structure–Activity Relationships for Silanes

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe shock‐tube technique has been used to investigate the reactions H + SiH4 → H2 + SiH3 (R1) and H + Si(CH3)4 → Si(CH3)3CH2 + H2 (R2) behind reflected shock waves. C2H5I was used as a thermal in situ source for H atoms. For reaction (R1), the experiments covered a temperature range of 1170–1251 K and for (R2) 1227–1320 K. In both cases, the pressures were near 1.5 bar. In these experiments, H atoms were monitored with atomic resonance absorption spectrometry. Fits to the H‐atom temporal concentration profiles applying postulated chemical kinetic reaction mechanisms were used for determining the rate constants k1 and k2. Experimental rate constants were well represented by the Arrhenius equations k1(T) = 2.75 × 10−9 exp(−37.78 kJ mol−1/RT) cm3 s−1 and k2(T) = 1.17 × 10−7 exp(−86.82 kJ mol−1/RT) cm3 s−1. Transition state theory (TST) calculations based on CBS‐QB3 and G4 levels of theory show good agreement with experimentally obtained rate constants; the experimental values for k1 and k2 are ∼40% lower and ∼50% larger than theoretical predictions, respectively. For the development of a mechanism describing the thermal decomposition of tetramethylsilane (Si(CH3)4; TMS), also TST‐based rate constants for reaction CH3 + Si(CH3)4 → Si(CH3)3CH2 + CH4 (R3) were calculated. A comparison between experimental and theoretical rate constants k2 and k3 with available rate constants from the literature indicates that Si(CH3)4 has very similar reactivity toward H abstractions like neopentane (C(CH3)4), which is the analog hydrocarbon to TMS. Based on these results, the possibility of drawing reactivity analogies between hydrocarbons and structurally similar silicon‐organic compounds for H‐atom abstractions is discussed.