Abstract

AbstractIn order to improve the quality of GaAs crystal, it is indispensable to conduct ultramicroanalysis of impurities in GaAs. For the analyses in this paper standard samples were made by adding a certain amount of impurities which can adequately be detected by chemical analyses. Using these samples, the SSMS, SIMS and chemical analysis methods are examined. The results are: (1) three chemical analysis methods (FLAA, ICP and colorimetric methods) are examined and permit a detection limit of 0.05 ∼ 5 ppm and a CV value of ±30%. (2) For the SSMS method, a process for making a specimen electrically conductive by applying a vacuum‐evaporated silver film is introduced. Comparing this result with those obtained by the chemical methods, a relative sensitivity factor is found which permits determination of the absolute value and it is possible to conduct analysis with detection limits of 10 ∼ 30 ppb and CV value of ±30%. (3) For the SIMS method, the secondary ionization yields for B, Al, Si, S, Cr and Mn are obtained, by comparison with the results of chemical analysis, which makes absolute quantitative analyses of these elements possible. The accuracy of quantitative analysis in which ion‐implanted specimens were used for the standard samples is confirmed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.