Abstract

The tropospheric delay of a microwave signal affects all space geodetic techniques. One possibility of modeling the delay is by introducing tropospheric models from external data sources. In this study, we present high-resolution models of tropospheric total refractivity and zenith total delay (ZTD) for the alpine area in Switzerland. The troposphere models are based on different combinations of data sources, including numerical weather prediction (NWP) model COSMO-1 with high spatial resolution of 1.1~hbox {km}~times ~1.1~hbox {km}, GNSS data from permanent geodetic stations and GPS L1-only data from low-cost permanent stations. The tropospheric parameters are interpolated to the arbitrary locations by the least-squares collocation method using the in-house developed software package COMEDIE (Collocation of Meteorological Data for Interpretation and Estimation of Tropospheric Pathdelays). The first goal of this study is to validate the obtained models with the reference radiosonde and GNSS data to show the improvement w.r.t. the previous studies that used lower resolution input data. In case of total refractivity, the profiles reconstructed from COSMO-1 model show the best agreement with the reference radiosonde measurements, with an average bias of 1.1 ppm (0.6% of the total refractivity value along a vertical profile) and standard deviation of 2.6 ppm (1.6%) averaged from the whole profile. The radiosondes are assimilated into COSMO-1 model; thus, a high correlation is expected, and this comparison is not independent. In case of ZTD, the GNSS-based model shows the highest agreement with the reference GNSS data, with an average bias of 0.2 mm (0.01%) and standard deviation of 4.3 mm (0.2%). For COSMO-based model, the agreement is also very high, especially compared to our previous studies with lower resolution NWPs. The average bias is equal to − 2.5 mm (0.1%) with standard deviation of 9.2 mm (0.5%). The second goal of this study is to test the feasibility of calculating high-resolution troposphere models over a limited area from coarser data sets. We calculate the ZTD models with spatial resolution of 20 m for a test area in Matter Valley. We include the information from the low-cost GPS stations (X-Sense), to also assess the performance and future usability of such stations. We validate the models based on three data sources w.r.t. the reference GNSS data. For the station located inside the area of the study, the models have an agreement of few mm with the reference data. For stations located further away from the study area, the agreement for X-Sense is smaller, but the standard deviations of residuals are still below 15 mm. We consider also another factor of evaluating the high-resolution models, i.e., spatial variability of the data. For designing a GNSS network, also for the tropospheric estimates, the height variability of the network may be as important as the horizontal distribution. The GNSS-based models are built from the coarsest network; thus, their variability is the lowest. The variability of X-Sense-based stations is the highest; thus, such data may be suitable for building troposphere models for very high-resolution applications.

Highlights

  • One of the main limitations of all space-borne microwave signal processing techniques is the atmospheric delay

  • The space-borne microwave techniques, in principle Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) or Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry (InSAR), are all subjected to the atmospheric delay

  • The troposphere models are calculated from three data sources: 2.1) numerical weather prediction (NWP) model COSMO-1 (Consortium for Smallscale Modeling1), 2.2) GNSS delays from geodetic permanent stations and 2.3) GPS delays from low-cost permanent stations in Matter Valley

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the main limitations of all space-borne microwave signal processing techniques is the atmospheric delay. We focus on building the troposphere model for future highresolution applications, such as for the space-borne InSAR technique, where the atmospheric effects are still one of the major challenges due to the different states of atmosphere, especially different water vapor densities, during two acquisitions (Lambiel et al 2008). In persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI), the goal is to identify coherent targets for which the atmosphereinduced phase can be isolated from other phase components, mainly residual topography and deformation Different methods, such as linear regression (Wicks et al 2002), linear or power law (Bekaert et al 2015a, b) or kriging (Siddique et al 2018), have been suggested to model the spatial dependence of tropospheric delays and interpolate them over the entire scene.

Data sources
Numerical weather prediction model COSMO-1
GNSS data
X-Sense low-cost GPS stations
Least-squares collocation method
Validation with reference data
Total refractivity comparisons with radiosonde
ZTDs comparisons with reference GNSS data
Calculation of the high-resolution models
Matter Valley case study
Accuracy assessment of the models
Combinations of data sources
Spatial variability of the models
Findings
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call