Abstract
In the Full Paper by Berke et al., Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 2121–2128, the following mistake has been noted: In Equation (2) the amount of olefin should be read as two equivalents, not eight. The authors apologise for this error and any confusion it may have caused.1
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
