Abstract
In the Full Paper by Berke et al., Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 2121–2128, the following mistake has been noted: In Equation (2) the amount of olefin should be read as two equivalents, not eight. The authors apologise for this error and any confusion it may have caused.1
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.