Abstract

AbstractNickel(II)‐mediated coupling between the cyanamide Me2NCN and the ketoximes Me(R)C=NOH (R = Me, Ph) gives chelates of the general formula [NiClx(H2O)y{HN=C(NMe2)(ON=C(R)Me)}2]n+ ([1]+: R = Me; x = 1, y = 0; salts with both Cl– and [NiCl4]2– were isolated; [2]2+: R = Me; x = 0, y = 2; salt with Cl– was isolated; [3]+: R = Ph; x = 1, y = 1; salt with Cl– was isolated) and the iminium salts [H2N=C(NMe2)ON=C(R)Me]+ ([4]+: R = Me; salt with [NiCl4]2– was isolated; [5]+: R = Ph; salt with Cl– was isolated). This reaction demonstrates the difference in the reactivity between conventional nitriles and dialkylcyanamides: whereas nitriles RCN (R = Alk, Ar) react with NiII/ketoxime systems to afford (1,3,5‐triazapentadiene)NiII species, formed by postulated nitrile–oxime coupling intermediates, cyanamides under the same conditions give either stable cyanamide–oxime coupling products or the Busch‐type complex [Ni{HN=C(Me)CH2C(Me2)NH2}2]Cl2 ([6]Cl2). The reason for the different stability of the coupling products was interpreted theoretically on the basis of quantum chemical calculations (M06‐L/6‐31G* level of theory). The NMe2 moiety in the chelate ligands leads to an increase in electron‐density delocalization and also stabilizes the systems in terms of electrostatic factors.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call