Abstract
In this work, we report calculated vibrational energy levels of the methane molecule up to 10 300 cm-1. Two potential energy surfaces constructed in quite different coordinate systems with different analytical representations are employed in order to evaluate the uncertainty of vibrational predictions. To calculate methane energy levels, we used two independent techniques of the variational method. One method uses an exact kinetic energy operator in internal curvilinear coordinates. Another one uses an expansion of Eckart-Watson nuclear motion Hamiltonian in rectilinear normal coordinates. In the Icosad range (up to five vibrational quanta bands-below 7800 cm-1), the RMS standard deviations between calculated and observed energy levels were 0.22 cm-1 and 0.41 cm-1 for these two quite different approaches. For experimentally well-known 3v3 sub-levels, the calculation accuracy is estimated to be ∼1 cm-1. In the Triacontad range (7660-9188 cm-1), the average error of the calculation is about 0.5 cm-1. The accuracy and convergence issues for higher energy ranges are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.