Highlights from the 5th Symposium on Biological Data Visualization: Part 1.

Abstract

High-throughput and high-resolution experimental methods in biology pose enormous challenges for current biological data visualization approaches. To address these challenges, researchers in the visualization and bioinformatics communities need to engage in the design, implementation, application, and evaluation of novel visualization techniques and tools that provide insight into large and highly complex data sets. BioVis 2015 - the fifth Symposium on Biological Data Visualization - brought together researchers from the visualization, bioinformatics, and biology communities to establish an interdisciplinary dialogue and promote the sharing of expertise between both meeting participants and the communities at large. The meeting educated, inspired, and engaged visualization researchers in problems in biological data visualization as well as bioinformatics and biology researchers in state-of-the-art visualization research. The symposium serves as a platform for researchers from these fields to increase the impact of data visualization approaches in biology. The BioVis 2015 symposium is affiliated with ISMB, the Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology conference, as a Special Interest Group (SIG) and was colocated with ISMB in Dublin, Ireland, July 10-11 2015. Each paper was reviewed by researchers from both the bioinformatics and visualization fields and was evaluated for improvements over state-of-the-art and for scientific soundness. The review process was organized in two review cycles. In the first review cycle, each paper was reviewed by three to four reviewers. In the second review cycle, the primary reviewers checked whether the required revisions for conditionally accepted papers were successfully included. Based on the reviewers' scores, reviews, and recommendations, the BioVis 2015 Paper and Publication Chairs and the BMC Bioinformatics Section Editor together selected those that would be published as a BMC Bioinformatics supplement. The papers from BioVis 2015 appear in two different proceedings: As of the 5th Symposium on Biological Data Visualization: Part 1 in this BMC Bioinformatics supplement and as of the 5th Symposium on Biological Data Visualization: Part 2 in BMC Proceedings (http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcproc/supplements/9/S6). From the 21 papers submitted to BioVis 2015, 9 papers are published in this BMC Bioinformatics supplement and 5 papers are published in BMC Proceedings. The articles in this supplement cover a wide spectrum of challenging problems in biological data visualization and their solutions. Overall, three main themes arise from the BioVis 2015 articles: omics, proteins, and imaging. In the omics field, Younesy et al. [1] describe VisRseq: a user-friendly interface for biologists to use libraries in R that provides a method for linking R-apps with interactive components. Chelaru et al. [2] expand on the design behind Epiviz, another tool for bringing genome visualization and computational environments together. Hennig et al. [3] describe Pan-Tetris and Aurisano et al. [4] describe BactoGeNIE: both systems are designed for comparing different genomes. The XCluSim tool by L'Yi et al. [5] has a more general application field and aims to provide insight into how different clustering results relate to each other. In the protein field, Stolte et al. [6] give an overview of the design decisions that underlie Aquaria, a visual analytics tool for exploring protein-related data. Finally, three papers are included from the imaging field. Topics range from image generation, as discussed by Abdellah et al. [7], to a method for parameter optimization in image processing by Pretorius et al. [9] (e.g. for cell nuclei detection and colour deconvolution for histology), and all the way to graph-based exploration of histology images in the GRAPHIE system proposed by Ding et al. [8]. The diversity of topics covered in this issue highlights the wide range of challenges in applying existing visualization techniques to biological data. With this analysis and formalization of our collective experiences, we hope to motivate visualization researchers to think about new problems and new approaches to pressing problems in biology.