High-level curricular integration in pharmacy schools: A systematic literature review

Abstract

BackgroundPharmacy school accreditors recommend curricular integration. With today's complex health care system, there is also a need for more intentional and seamless blending, characterizing what we propose as “high-level curricular integration” (i.e. intentional “weaving” of multiple disciplines to form a coherent whole). Despite accreditors' recommendations, the practical definition and implementation guidelines of high-level curricular integration are not clear. We aimed to describe high-level curricular integration practices in pharmacy schools by systematically reviewing the literature addressing four elements of high-level curricular integration. These were (1) organizational thread, (2) pedagogies, (3) evaluation strategies, and (4) barriers. MethodsA PRISMA-guided (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) literature search strategy was conducted to examine the scientific literature. Inclusion criteria were English written literature related to one or more of the four elements of high-level curricular integration in pharmacy schools. ResultsAfter screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, 28 articles were included. The most used organizational thread was disease-oriented (n = 8, 28.5%), and the most reported pedagogy was case studies (n = 11, 39%). Over half of the studies reported how the integration experience was evaluated. Most studies addressed barriers (n = 21, 75%), with the most reported barriers being time (n = 12, 42%) and workload (n = 12, 42%). ImplicationsThis review aimed to define and describe high-level integration within schools of pharmacy through four elements. Numerous and diverse trends were identified, and these four elements should be considered when planning, implementing, evaluating, and reporting curriculum integration experiences.