Abstract
English higher verbs impose constraints on the form of their nonfinite complements (i.e., gerunds and infinitives) functioning as objects of the verbs. A number of linguists and grammarians, notably Bolinger (1968) and Wood (1965), have looked at the proposition and tried to identify a principle that can be used to account for the underlying semantic distinction. The strategies of Bolinger and Wood are insufficient to explain the occurrence of the nonfinite complements following various higher verbs or to express the subtleties of the phenomenon. The objective of this article is to analyze strategies about higher verbs and their nonfinite complements with submerged logical subjects and resolve the apparent contradiction between the positions of Bolinger and Wood. Bolinger (1968) formulated the hypothesis that the infinitive very often ex
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
