Abstract

BackgroundAlthough several epidemiological studies have suggested that high serum uric acid (SUA) levels are related to a decline in kidney function, only a few studies have investigated using cystatin C to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We aimed to clarify the relationship between SUA levels and kidney function assessed by cystatin C in a Japanese general community population without chronic kidney disease (CKD).MethodsWe conducted a community-based cross-sectional study that included 1086 healthy participants, aged 40–74 years, without CKD and not undergoing treatment of hyperuricemia, who had participated in the baseline survey of the Kobe Orthopedic and Biomedical Epidemiological (KOBE) study. The preconditions for participation in this study were no past histories of cardiovascular disease or cancer, and not undergoing treatment for diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. We classified the participants into quartiles stratified by sex according to their SUA level and then examined the relationship with eGFR. The odds ratios for having a low eGFR, defined as the lowest quartile of eGFR (i.e., ≤78.4 mL/min/1. 73m2) was estimated according to SUA quartiles (men, Q1 ≤ 5.0, Q2 5.1–5.9, Q3 6.0–6.6, and Q4 ≥ 6.7; women, Q1 ≤ 3.8, Q2 3.9–4.3, Q3 4.4–4.9, and Q4 ≥ 5.0 mg/dL) after adjustment for age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, HbA1c, high and low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and smoking and drinking habits. The adjusted mean of each quartile was also calculated.ResultsMultivariable-adjusted means of eGFR showed a graded decrease in higher SUA quartiles (men, Q1 90.5, Q2 88.0, Q3 83.5, and Q4 82.0; women, Q1 95.7, Q2 91.3, Q3 89.2, and Q4 86.7). In addition, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for having a lower eGFR (95% confidence interval) for each SUA quartile compared with Q1 was Q2 2.29 (0.98, 5.35), Q3 4.94 (2.04, 11.97), and Q4 8.01 (3.20, 20.04) for men, and was Q2 2.20 (1.12, 4.32), Q3 2.68 (1.39, 5.20), and Q4 4.96 (2.62, 9.41) for women.ConclusionsThere was a graded inverse relationship between mild elevations in SUA levels and eGFR assessed by cystatin C in an apparently healthy Japanese population without CKD. This association was similar in both men and women.

Highlights

  • Several epidemiological studies have suggested that high serum uric acid (SUA) levels are related to a decline in kidney function, only a few studies have investigated using cystatin C to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate

  • The present study showed that higher SUA levels were associated inversely with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels assessed by cystatin C in the general community population without chronic kidney disease (CKD) or a past history of cardiovascular disease or cancer, and not undergoing treatment for diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia or hyperuricemia

  • The results of the present study showed a graded inverse association between SUA levels and eGFR assessed by cystatin C in both men and women

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several epidemiological studies have suggested that high serum uric acid (SUA) levels are related to a decline in kidney function, only a few studies have investigated using cystatin C to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A 7-year follow-up study of Japanese subjects showed that serum uric acid (SUA) levels and increased levels of serum creatinine were significantly related, and that hyperuricemia (≥6.0 mg/dL) was associated with progression of end stage renal disease in women. Maintenance of a normal SUA level was important for maintaining normal renal function [1] Another follow-up study of Japanese individuals without chronic kidney disease (CKD) reported that the rate of CKD onset in the group with high SUA levels at baseline was greater than that in the group with a lower SUA level, and that the rate of decline in renal function per year was rapid [2]. The level of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) assessed by cystatin C is not influenced by either muscle mass, nutrition, or physical activity status and is considered to be a suitable method for evaluating mild renal dysfunction [9]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call