Abstract
Thomas J. Flatley owned an apartment complex in Malden, Massachusetts. In all, the complex had 13 buildings containing 919 apartment units. The city has a three‐tiered water rate system that includes, in addition to a flat rate for up to 1,000 cu ft (28 m3) of water, three incrementally higher rates per 100 cu ft (2.8 m3) as usage increases. Each building has a single water meter, meaning that Flatley pays much of the water bill at the high‐usage rates. The court assumed these higher charges were ultimately paid by the residents of the complex. Flatley challenged the rate system as creating an impermissible discrimination between consumers who receive the same service under similar conditions, i.e, between apartment dwellers and residents of single family homes. The trial court ruled against Flatley. The decision was upheld by an appellate court.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.