Abstract

High intensity proton linacs (HIPLs) for applications such as Accelerator Driven Reactor Systems (ADRS) have serious beam dynamics issues related to beam halo formation. This can lead to particle loss and radioactivation of the surroundings which consequently limit the beam current. Beam halos are largely driven by the nonlinear space-charge force of the beam, which depends strongly on the beam distribution and also on the initial beam mismatch. We propose here the use of a higher order mode beam (HOMB), that has a weaker nonlinear force, to mitigate beam halos. We first show how the nonlinear space-charge force can itself be exploited in the presence of nonlinear solenoid fields, to produce a HOMB in the low energy beam transport (LEBT) line. We then study the transport of such a beam through a radio frequency quadrupole (RFQ), and show that the HOMB has a significant advantage in terms of emittance blow-up, halo formation and beam loss, over a Gaussian beam, even with a finite initial mismatch. For example, for the transport of a 30 mA beam through the RFQ, with an initial beam mismatch of 45%, the Gaussian beam sees an emittance blow-up of 125%, while the HOMB sees a blow-up of only 35% (relative to the initial emittance of $0.2\ensuremath{\pi}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{mm}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{mrad}$). Similarly, the beam halo parameter and beam loss are 0.95 and 25% respectively for a Gaussian beam, but only 0.35 and 15% for a HOMB. The beam dynamics of the HOMB agrees quite well with the particle-core model, because of the more linear space-charge force, while for the Gaussian beam there are additional particle loss mechanisms arising from nonlinear resonances. Therefore, the HOMB suppresses emittance blow-up and halo formation, and can make high current ADRS systems more viable.

Highlights

  • High intensity proton linacs (HIPLs) are necessary for many applications such as spallation neutron sources [1,2] and neutrino production [3], and in Accelerator Driven Reactor Systems (ADRS) for energy production [4], waste transmutation [5], and thorium production [6]

  • The nonlinear Coulomb repulsion or spacecharge force is very strong, and can lead to the production of beam halos, i.e. diffusion of particles to large distances from the center. This is an important concern in HIPLs, because these halo particles will be lost at the walls of the vacuum chamber, resulting in radioactivation of the chamber and surroundings, which is a significant safety concern that can limit the maximum operating beam current

  • For an initial Gaussian beam we find that at lower values of the current the transverse particle distribution at the exit of the low energy beam transport (LEBT) remains close to Gaussian, but as we raise the current the particle density at the center first flattens out, and as we cross a threshold value of 700 μA the beam starts becoming hollow, as shown in Fig. 2(a), with the density at the center being around half the density at the peak

Read more

Summary

Abhishek Pathak and Srinivas Krishnagopal

Ion Accelerator Development Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India (Received 8 February 2016; published 3 January 2017). High intensity proton linacs (HIPLs) for applications such as Accelerator Driven Reactor Systems (ADRS) have serious beam dynamics issues related to beam halo formation. This can lead to particle loss and radioactivation of the surroundings which limit the beam current. We study the transport of such a beam through a radio frequency quadrupole (RFQ), and show that the HOMB has a significant advantage in terms of emittance blow-up, halo formation and beam loss, over a Gaussian beam, even with a finite initial mismatch. The beam dynamics of the HOMB agrees quite well with the particle-core model, because of the more linear space-charge force, while for the Gaussian beam there are additional particle loss mechanisms arising from nonlinear resonances. The HOMB suppresses emittance blow-up and halo formation, and can make high current ADRS systems more viable

INTRODUCTION
ABHISHEK PATHAK and SRINIVAS KRISHNAGOPAL
1Þψ þ ðl
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call