Abstract

In this article, third- and fourth-order accurate explicit time integration methods are developed for effective analyses of various linear and nonlinear dynamic problems stated by second-order ordinary differential equations in time. Two sets of the new methods are developed by employing the collocation approach in the time domain. To remedy some shortcomings of using the explicit Runge-Kutta methods for second-order ordinary differential equations in time, the new methods are designed to introduce small period and damping errors in the important low-frequency range. For linear cases, the explicitness of the new methods is not affected by the presence of non-diagonal damping matrix. For nonlinear cases, the new methods can handle velocity dependent problems explicitly without decreasing order of accuracy. The new methods do not have any undetermined algorithmic parameters. Improved numerical solutions are obtained when they are applied to various linear and nonlinear problems.

Highlights

  • Step-by-step direct time integrations are dominantly used for transient analyses of linear and nonlinear dynamic problems described by second-order ordinary differential equations in time

  • Explicit methods are more frequently used in analyses of large systems, such as the wave propagation and impact problems, where sizes of optimal time steps are slightly smaller than critical time steps of explicit methods

  • 6 Concluding remarks The new third- and fourth-order explicit methods presented in this paper could provide accurate numerical solutions when applied to various linear and nonlinear test problems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Step-by-step direct time integrations are dominantly used for transient analyses of linear and nonlinear dynamic problems described by second-order ordinary differential equations in time. Numerous implicit [5-9] and explicit [10-16] time integration methods have been introduced to effectively analyze challenging dynamic problems. The Soares method can be used for the analysis of wave propagation problems, but it becomes an only first-order accurate implicit method in the presence of non-diagonal damping matrix. The Kim and Lee (KL) method can include a full range of dissipative cases and remain as a second-order explicit method in the presence of a nondiagonal damping matrix. Numerical solutions of the RK methods may become inaccurate by the excessive numerical damping if large time steps are used For this reason, the RK methods were not recommended for the analysis of structural dynamics, while many second-order explicit methods gained popularity. The single-degree-of-freedom case of the linear structural dynamics equation given in Eq(3) is used in the procedures of the development

New third-order accurate explicit method
New fourth-order accurate explicit method
Review of the Runge-Kutta methods
Third-order Runge-Kutta
Fourth-order Runge-Kutta Method In the fourth-order RK method, uü ts is computed as (50)
Analysis of the new methods
Order of accuracy
Spectral radius and stability limit
Period and damping error
Numerical examples
Single-degree-of-freedom problem
Elastic hardening spring problems
Elastic softening spring problems
Nonlinear single pendulum problem
Spring-pendulum problem
Findings
Double pendulum problem

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.