Abstract

Prey species can respond to the presence of predators by inducing phenotypic plastic traits which form morphological, life history or behavioral defenses. These so-called inducible defenses have evolved within a cost-benefit framework. They are only formed when they are needed, and costs associated with defenses are saved when predators are not present. However, a disadvantage compared to permanent defenses are lag phases between predator perception and the full formation of defenses. This may be especially important when the predation risk persists for longer periods, e.g., outlasts one generation and challenges prey offspring. We hypothesized that transgenerational induced phenotypic plasticity reduces lag phases in situations where hazards threaten specimens over several generations. We tested this in three generations of the freshwater crustaceanDaphnia lumholtziusing the three-spined sticklebackGasterosteus aculeatusas predator. In the presence of chemical cues from fishD. lumholtziexpresses elongated head and tail spines. In the F0 generation defenses are constraint by a comparatively long lag phase and are not developed prior to the 3rd instar. In the F1, and F2 of induced animals this lag phase is shortened and defenses are developed upon birth. We show that induction of TGP in the mothers takes place already during the juvenile stages and transfers to the offspring generation in forms of shortened time lags and enhanced trait expression. When progeny is additionally exposed to fish cues as embryos, the addition of maternal and embryonic effects further enhances the magnitude of defense expression. Our findings detail a distinguished strategy of transgenerational phenotypic plasticity which allows to shorten lag phases of trait changes in phenotypic plasticity.

Highlights

  • In environments with fluctuating conditions, dedicated mechanisms that allow fast phenotypic adaptation may be crucial to improve organismal fitness (Auld et al, 2010; Holeski et al, 2012; Shama et al, 2014; Hendry, 2016; Luquet and Tariel, 2016)

  • In the 1st juvenile instar of the F1 and F2 generation medium head spine length reaches 190.75 and 201.64 μm in predator exposed D. lumholtzi. This is significantly larger than the head spine length of control D. lumholtzi of the equivalent generations (median 166.25 and 163.85 μm (Figures 2B,C and Supplementary Tables 3, 4)

  • Head spine lengths in the first juvenile instar are significantly larger in the F1 (190.74 μm) and F2 (201.64 μm) in comparison to the F0 (160.38 μm) generation (Figure 2D and Supplementary Tables 5, 6)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In environments with fluctuating conditions, dedicated mechanisms that allow fast phenotypic adaptation may be crucial to improve organismal fitness (Auld et al, 2010; Holeski et al, 2012; Shama et al, 2014; Hendry, 2016; Luquet and Tariel, 2016). Very often the occurrence of phenotypic plasticity is described within one generation (within generational plasticity WGP; Ezard et al, 2014; English et al, 2015; Auge et al, 2017), but when environmental hazards are long-lasting, offspring performance can be enhanced if they are being prepared by the parents (Agrawal et al, 1999; Uller, 2008) This kind of transgenerational plasticity (TGP) is discussed to be enabled via epigenetic, cytoplasmic, somatic, nutritional and behavioral modifications from parents to offspring (Bonduriansky and Day, 2009; Harris et al, 2012). Timing is crucial as TGP may be limited to early life exposure with critical developmental windows for cue sensitivity (Hanson and Skinner, 2016; Sentis et al, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call