Abstract
Paulo Freire’s widely respected work on pedagogies of the oppressed (1996) and hope (1992) made him known across the world. He is known to have, among many of his unravelling thoughts, objected to oppression and illuminated hope and freedom for the oppressed. In addition, Freire maintained that the liberation of the oppressed and, by extension, the liberation of the oppressor can emanate only from the oppressed. Thus, the ball in this regard may inadvertently be seen to be in the court of the oppressed. The South African higher education system in particular, as well as the education system in general, have continuously presented, contrary to the oppressors’ intentions, lecture rooms as sites or spaces where oppressive tendencies were deliberated and challenged. Contributing to the interrogation of, or on, oppression was an underlying quest for liberation, grounded on the utility of higher education as a vehicle for liberation. Therefore, higher education could not be divorced from the liberation struggle. In this article, the author traverses the history of the liberation struggle through the eyes of those who cared to write about it, as well as those who walked and toiled the grounds and lecture rooms of the then University of the North (Qwaqwa Branch), and the three former teacher training colleges in the former Qwaqwa homeland. It is argued that, while the reason for the existence of the former was to build capacity among the civil servants in the homeland and the provision of teaching qualifications for the latter (colleges), those higher education institutions made far-reaching and indelible contributions in respect of dealing with oppression and advancing the liberation struggle during the apartheid era and beyond.
Highlights
The fact that education was used as a means of oppression or subjugation, with a view to create a sense of inferiority among the Africans living in South Africa, while preparing
While it was expected that the school curriculum content would be structured and presented in a manner that perpetuates oppressive and often “malicious” intent, the resistance movements in schools mounted an attack, even though such efforts may have been hamstrung by the rigid and alien curriculum content
The rigidity and foreign curriculum content, with a colonial repertoire, was more effectively challenged at higher education institutions. These students formed the majority of students exposed to legislation, such as the Bantu Education Act, 1953 (Act 47 of 1953) and the Group Areas Act, 1950 (Act 41 of 1950)
Summary
The fact that education was used as a means of oppression or subjugation, with a view to create a sense of inferiority among the Africans living in South Africa (including the former Qwaqwa Homeland), while preparing. Hlalele Higher Education and the liberation struggle in the former Qwaqwa homeland them for menial jobs (RSA 1953), is well documented (Hartshorne 1992; Kallaway 1984; 2002). Douglass (1855) further indicates that, as was the case with slavery, the struggle for liberation intensified under colonial rule In both slavery and oppression, the common denominator was an attempt to claim some measure of freedom against an institution that defined people fundamentally as property (Sweet s.a.). It later became associated with politics during the colonial era. A brief history of the former Qwaqwa Homeland will be given
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
