Abstract

We study the effect of a shock on firms’ costs in a general setting by considering both perfect and imperfect competition and a general cost function. We show that, counterintuitively, firms’ profits may increase with cost increases. We generalize Seade’s (1985) results by considering the adaptation of firms’ technological process. We find an additional effect that we call and which is determined by the extent to which firms’ marginal and average costs differ as a result of a shock. This effect is broken down into two components: the indirect technology which is related to the elasticity of the demand slope, and the technology which is solely related to technology. We apply this framework to environmental regulations, which provide a good context in which to examine technological process adaptation because they push firms to use abatement technologies and to modify their production processes. We introduce an explicit abatement cost function that is sufficiently flexible to represent the various types of abatement technologies that are found in the literature: end-of-pipe technology, process-integrated technology, and cleaner production (or fuel switching). We show that end-of-pipe abatement technologies induce a positive direct technology effect, that process integrated abatement technologies induce a negative technology effect, and that cleaner production induces a null technology effect.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.