Abstract

Age-related comorbidities accumulate faster in people with HIV (PWH) than in those without HIV. We evaluated whether a validated multimorbidity scale, the Charlson index, predicted neurocognitive trajectories in PWH. Scaled scores of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery were averaged across all visits. Multilevel modeling examined between- and within-person predictors of global neurocognition. At the between-person level, averaged Charlson scores were examined as a predictor of neurocognitive change rate, covarying for HIV disease characteristics. Within-persons, visit-specific Charlson index was used to predict fluctuations in global neurocognition at the same and next visit, covarying for disease measures. Participants were 1195 PWH (mean baseline age: 43.0; SD: 9.7 years) followed for a mean of 7.1 years (range: 0.5-20.5). At the between-person level, more rapid neurocognitive worsening correlated with higher (worse) average Charlson scores (standardized β: -0.062; SE: 0.015; P = .001) and lower CD4 nadir (standardized β: 0.055; SE: 0.021; P = .011), but not viral suppression or average CD4+ lymphocytes (P > .05). At the within-person level, poorer visit-specific neurocognition was related to worse concurrent, but not preceding, Charlson scores (standardized β: -0.046; SE: 0.015; P = .003), detectable HIV viral load (standardized β: 0.018; SE: 0.006; P = .001), and higher CD4+ (standardized β: 0.043; SE: 0.009; P < .001). The impact of comorbidities on neurocognitive decline exceeded that of HIV disease factors. Although correlative, the temporal relationships suggested that treatment of comorbidities might improve neurocognitive prognosis for PWH.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.