Abstract

Background High wear rates and femoral and acetabular osteolysis have been—and still are—the main problems in uncemented total hip replacement. We reviewed 96 consecutive cementless total hip replacements of 4 different designs.Patients and methods 21 PCA, 25 Harris Galante Porous/Harris Galante I (stem/cup), 25 Profile pressfit/ Tri-Lock Plus (stem/cup) and 25 Profile HA-coated/Tri-Lock Plus (stem/cup) prostheses were included. The operations were performed in the period 1984–1991. Median follow-up ranged from 12–16 years. Wear and osteolysis were measured.Results Mean linear wear rates ranged from 0.17 to 0.21 mm/year in the 4 groups, and there were no statistically significant differences between the groups (p = 0.9, ANOVA). Moderate or extensive osteolysis was found in 46 of the 96 hips included. The association between high and low wear rates (more or less than 0.20 mm/ year) and extent of osteolysis was statistically significant (p < 0.001, t-test). We found poor 12-year survival of the primary prostheses in all 4 groups (50–70%), mainly due to revisions because of wear of the polyethylene liner and/or osteolysis. The infrequently documented Profile/Tri-Lock Plus systems did not perform differently from the PCA and the HG.Interpretation The poor long-term results with these uncemented total hip arthroplasties illustrate the necessity of regular radiographic evaluation in order to detect osteolysis and liner failure, which are both generally asymptomatic until catastrophic failure appears.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call