Abstract

High tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) has been proposed as a predictive biomarker for response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), largely due to the potential for tumor mutations to generate immunogenic neoantigens. Despite recent pan-cancer approval of ICB treatment for any TMB-H tumor, as assessed by the targeted FoundationOne CDx assay in nine tumor types, the utility of this biomarker has not been fully demonstrated across all cancers. Data from over 10000 patient tumors included in The Cancer Genome Atlas were used to compare approaches to determine TMB and identify the correlation between predicted neoantigen load and CD8 T cells. Association of TMB with ICB treatment outcomes was analyzed by both objective response rates (ORRs, N= 1551) and overall survival (OS, N= 1936). In cancer types where CD8 T-cell levels positively correlated with neoantigen load, such as melanoma, lung,and bladder cancers, TMB-H tumors exhibited a 39.8% ORR to ICB [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.9-44.8], which was significantly higher than that observed in low TMB (TMB-L) tumors [odds ratio (OR)= 4.1, 95% CI 2.9-5.8, P < 2× 10-16]. In cancer types that showed no relationship between CD8 T-cell levels and neoantigen load, such as breast cancer, prostate cancer, and glioma, TMB-H tumors failed to achieve a 20% ORR (ORR= 15.3%, 95% CI 9.2-23.4, P= 0.95), and exhibited a significantly lower ORR relative to TMB-L tumors (OR= 0.46, 95% CI 0.24-0.88, P= 0.02). Bulk ORRs were not significantly different between the two categories of tumors (P= 0.10) for patient cohorts assessed. Equivalent results were obtained by analyzing OS and by treating TMB as a continuous variable. Our analysis failed to support application of TMB-H as a biomarker for treatment with ICB in all solid cancer types. Further tumor type-specific studies are warranted.

Highlights

  • The advent of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) proteins has revolutionized cancer therapy, providing robust, durable responses in a subset of patients with cancer

  • In cancer types where CD8 T-cell levels positively correlated with neoantigen load, such as melanoma, lung, and bladder cancers, TMB-H tumors exhibited a 39.8% objective response rate (ORR) to ICB [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.9-44.8], which was significantly higher than that observed in low TMB (TMB-L) tumors [odds ratio (OR) 1⁄4 4.1, 95% CI 2.9-5.8, P < 2 Â 10À16]

  • We found that only roughly a quarter of new cancer cases were in types where there was a positive correlation between neoantigen load and CD8 T-cell infiltration, whereas over 50% of estimated new cancer cases come from cancer types where neoantigen load does not correlate with CD8 T-cell infiltration (Figure 1B)

Read more

Summary

Background

High tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) has been proposed as a predictive biomarker for response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), largely due to the potential for tumor mutations to generate immunogenic neoantigens. Patients and methods: Data from over 10 000 patient tumors included in The Cancer Genome Atlas were used to compare approaches to determine TMB and identify the correlation between predicted neoantigen load and CD8 T cells. Results: In cancer types where CD8 T-cell levels positively correlated with neoantigen load, such as melanoma, lung, and bladder cancers, TMB-H tumors exhibited a 39.8% ORR to ICB [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.9-44.8], which was significantly higher than that observed in low TMB (TMB-L) tumors [odds ratio (OR) 1⁄4 4.1, 95% CI 2.9-5.8, P < 2 Â 10À16].

INTRODUCTION
RESULTS
D Metastatic melanoma
DISCUSSION
Metastatic TNBC
DISCLOSURE
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.