Abstract

Science education has progressed very rapidly both in terms of content and skills as learning experiences. This progress must be responded to by every student and their background, including Sundanese people. Cloning is one aspect of science education content that goes along its controversy, so that argumentation skills are very suitable for every student. It is hoped that they will form opinions based on their point of view on the issue. Sundanese people are known to be simple and to keep their ancestral knowledge from generation to generation. Therefore, it will be very interesting to research how they form opinions on the issue of cloning. This study aimed to investigate the argumentation skills of the eleventh-grade students of a Sundanese High School about Human cloning based on gender and cultural habits. This qualitative research probed argumentation skill quality by claim forming and evidence supplying. Forty-four students of the eleventh-grade were given a research instrument with a snowball sampling technique. Students’ worksheet of cloning was used to trawl data of written argumentation skills. Semi-structured interviews encompassed oral argumentation skills data. The family’s gender awareness data were obtained through questionnaires and interviews. Furthermore, this research utilized a data triangulation tool by using field notes. Four-scale rubrics were used to determine students’ argumentation skills with inductive analysis as a tool to examine the data. The results show that most of the research subjects (Sundanese students) can create simple argument can create mentation skills better than written argumentation skills with relatively no significant differences based on gender differences. According to this research finding, several factors influencing Sundanese students' argumentation skills, such as freedom of opinion-forming in family life, students' role in the family, articulating ideas, and cultural influences, are suggestions.

Highlights

  • Science education should give fruitful experiences to students’ real life

  • Based on the gender aspect, in general, there are no significant differences between male and female students related to the argumentation skills in responding to socio-scientific issues

  • This research investigated students’ argumentation skills of the Sundanese ethnic group, which stood between Levels 2 and 3

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Science education should give fruitful experiences to students’ real life. Students should develop their knowledge, thinking process, and good attitudes through science education for a better life. Knowledge acquisition, thinking process skills, and attitudes of the students accumulate learning experience and educational process (Anderson, 2012). Students’ argumentation skills will be one of the success indicators of their role in society. Students’ argumentation skills are concerned with their decision-making ability to solve a problem (Erduran et al, 2004; Osborne et al, 2004) and linked to their reasoning ability (Ekanara et al, 2018). Argumentation skills give a basic foundation to decision-makers to make the best decision from all available choices and to have awareness about the decision that has been taken (Kuhn & Udell, 2003)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call