Abstract

The goal of our research is to identify strengths and weaknesses of high school level science fair and improvements that might enhance learning outcomes based on empirical assessment of student experiences. We use the web-based data collection program REDCap to implement anonymous and voluntary surveys about science fair experiences with two independent groups—high school students who recently competed in the Dallas Regional Science and Engineering Fair and post high school students (undergraduates, 1st year medical students, and 1st year biomedical graduate students) on STEM education tracks doing research at UT Southwestern Medical Center. Herein, we report quantitative and qualitative data showing student opinions about the value of science fair. Few students in any group thought that competitive science fair (C-SF) should be required. The most common reasons given for not requiring C-SF were no enjoyment and no interest in competing. On the other hand, student attitudes towards requiring non-competitive science fair (NC-SF) were nuanced and ranged as high as 91%, increasing with student maturation, science fair experience, and STEM track. The most common reasons given for requiring NC-SF were learning scientific thinking skills and research skills. Students opposed to requiring NC-SF most frequently mentioned no enjoyment and no interest in science. Several student comments critical of the fairness of science fair led us to determine possible differences in science fair experiences depending on whether or not students received help from scientists. Those who received help from scientists had an easier time getting their research idea, more access to articles in books and magazines, and less difficulty getting resources. We discuss the idea that two different types of science fairs—competitive science fair with a performance goal orientation and non-competitive science fair with a mastery goal orientation—might be required to promote the broad goal of educating all students about science and engineering.

Highlights

  • Generation Science Standards (NGSS) describes practice of science as one of three key dimensions of science education [1]

  • To aim for a more robust view of science fair and to learn if students shared similar experiences notwithstanding different structures of science fairs, we studied two independent groups: a local group of high school students who recently had participated in the Dallas regional science fair and a state/national group of students who were post high school and at different degrees of advancement along STEM-relevant educational paths

  • The students were mostly from a suburban Dallas district with a strong commitment to science education that encourages but does not require students to carry out a science fair project

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Generation Science Standards (NGSS) describes practice of science as one of three key dimensions of science education [1]. Science fair brings together many of the elements of practice—problem selection, experimental design and implementation, data analysis, and communication of research findings–and by doing so offers students one of the few opportunities in science education to experience for themselves these practices combined. Science fair has a long history and is widely implemented as part of informal and formal science education across schools in the United States [2] reported by some to be on the decline [3,4]. At the 2018 Sundance Film Festival, the film Science Fair won the Festival Favorite Award. Despite the visibility and attention, few empirical studies have been published that examine the high school science fair experience and its impact. Most of the science fair literature consists of anecdotal essays, both favorable [6,7,8,9] and unfavorable [10,11,12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call