Abstract

Should music be a priority in public education? One argument for teaching music in school is that private music instruction relates to enhanced language abilities and neural function. However, the directionality of this relationship is unclear and it is unknown whether school-based music training can produce these enhancements. Here we show that 2 years of group music classes in high school enhance the neural encoding of speech. To tease apart the relationships between music and neural function, we tested high school students participating in either music or fitness-based training. These groups were matched at the onset of training on neural timing, reading ability, and IQ. Auditory brainstem responses were collected to a synthesized speech sound presented in background noise. After 2 years of training, the neural responses of the music training group were earlier than at pre-training, while the neural timing of students in the fitness training group was unchanged. These results represent the strongest evidence to date that in-school music education can cause enhanced speech encoding. The neural benefits of musical training are, therefore, not limited to expensive private instruction early in childhood but can be elicited by cost-effective group instruction during adolescence.

Highlights

  • The role of music education in schools is under debate, as music competes with other in-school programs for access to a small pool of funding

  • The two groups were matched on stimulus-response lag in year 1

  • Here we show that high school music instruction enhances the neural representation of speech in background noise, a neural advantage previously found to result from more extensive one-on-one training

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The role of music education in schools is under debate, as music competes with other in-school programs for access to a small pool of funding. Highly trained musicians display an impressive advantage for perceiving speech in background noise relative to their musically naive counterparts (Parbery-Clark et al, 2009b, 2011; Strait et al, 2012; Zendel and Alain, 2012) Linked to this behavioral advantage is a greater neural resilience to background noise and other forms of acoustic degradations (Bidelman and Krishnan, 2010). Noise delays the neural response to sound (Burkard and Sims, 2002); faster neural responses to degraded speech are consistently linked to music training (Parbery-Clark et al, 2009a; Kraus and Chandrasekaran, 2010; Strait et al, 2012), enhanced speech-in-noise perception (ParberyClark et al, 2009a), and better reading abilities (Anderson et al, 2010) across the lifespan (see Kraus and Chandrasekaran, 2010; Strait and Kraus, 2013 for reviews)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call