Abstract

Abstract. An ensemble simulation of five regional climate models (RCMs) from the coordinated regional downscaling experiment in East Asia is evaluated and used to project future regional climate change in China. The influences of model uncertainty and internal variability on projections are also identified. The RCMs simulate the historical (1980–2005) climate and future (2006–2049) climate projections under the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) RCP4.5 scenario. The simulations for five subregions in China, including northeastern China, northern China, southern China, northwestern China, and the Tibetan Plateau, are highlighted in this study. Results show that (1) RCMs can capture the climatology, annual cycle, and interannual variability of temperature and precipitation and that a multi-model ensemble (MME) outperforms that of an individual RCM. The added values for RCMs are confirmed by comparing the performance of RCMs and global climate models (GCMs) in reproducing annual and seasonal mean precipitation and temperature during the historical period. (2) For future (2030–2049) climate, the MME indicates consistent warming trends at around 1 ∘C in the entire domain and projects pronounced warming in northern and western China. The annual precipitation is likely to increase in most of the simulation region, except for the Tibetan Plateau. (3) Generally, the future projected change in annual and seasonal mean temperature by RCMs is nearly consistent with the results from the driving GCM. However, changes in annual and seasonal mean precipitation exhibit significant inter-RCM differences and possess a larger magnitude and variability than the driving GCM. Even opposite signals for projected changes in average precipitation between the MME and the driving GCM are shown over southern China, northeastern China, and the Tibetan Plateau. (4) The uncertainty in projected mean temperature mainly arises from the internal variability over northern and southern China and the model uncertainty over the other three subregions. For the projected mean precipitation, the dominant uncertainty source is the internal variability over most regions, except for the Tibetan Plateau, where the model uncertainty reaches up to 60 %. Moreover, the model uncertainty increases with prediction lead time across all subregions.

Highlights

  • Averaged surface temperature increased by 0.65– 1.06 ◦C from 1880 to 2012 according to several independently produced datasets, and further increases ranging from 0.3 to 4.8 ◦C are projected for 2081–2100 relative to 1986– 2005 using a set of global climate models (GCMs) driven by the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios RCP2.6 to RCP8.5 (IPCC, 2013)

  • We evaluate the performance of five regional climate models (RCMs) within Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX)-EA to reproduce present-day climate and analyze the projected future climate change under the middle emission scenario

  • Considering its easier access and wider usage in the evaluation of RCMs used in China and East Asia (Wang et al, 2017), the Climate Research Unit Timeseries 3.23 (CRU) product is used as the reference temperature data in this study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Averaged surface temperature increased by 0.65– 1.06 ◦C from 1880 to 2012 according to several independently produced datasets, and further increases ranging from 0.3 to 4.8 ◦C are projected for 2081–2100 relative to 1986– 2005 using a set of global climate models (GCMs) driven by the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios RCP2.6 to RCP8.5 (IPCC, 2013). The mei-yu rainfall band is missing in GCMs, even though the monsoon circulation is reproduced well Considering these deficiencies, high-resolution GCMs have been developed to improve the capabilities in the simulation of monsoon features, including orographic precipitation, low-level jet orientation, and variability, as well as the mei-yu onset and withdrawal (Kitoh et al, 2013; Kusunoki et al, 2006). Despite large improvements in the simulation of local processes, future climate projections are still accompanied by large uncertainties stemming from different sources, including the forcing GCMs, emission scenarios, downscaling methods (RCMs or statistical downscaling methods), and natural climate internal variability (Déqué et al, 2007; Deser et al, 2012).

Observations
Models and experiments
Analysis methods
Historical annual average climate evaluation
Interannual and seasonal variability
The added values for RCMs
Future change in climatology
Change in seasonal cycle
Inter-RCM variability of multi-RCM projections
Summary and conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.