Abstract

BackgroundThe diagnosis of benign renal oncocytomas (RO) and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (RCC) based on their morphology remains uncertain in several cases.MethodsWe have applied Affymetrix GeneChip Mapping 250 K NspI high-density oligoarrays to identify small genomic alterations, which may occur beyond the specific losses of entire chromosomes, and also Affymetrix GeneChip HG-U133 Plus2.0 oligoarrays for gene expression profiling.ResultsBy analysing of DNA extracted from 30 chRCCs and 42 ROs, we have confirmed the high specificity of monosomies of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17 and 21 in 70–93% of the chRCCs, while ROs displayed loss of chromosome 1 and 14 in 24% and 5% of the cases, respectively. We demonstrated that chromosomal gene expression biases might correlate with chromosomal abnormalities found in chromophobe RCCs and ROs. The vast majority genes downregulated in chromophobe RCC were mapped to chromosomes 2, 6, 10, 13 and 17. However, most of the genes overexpressed in chromophobe RCCs were located to chromosomes without any copy number changes indicating a transcriptional regulation as a main event.ConclusionThe SNP-array analysis failed to detect recurrent small deletions, which may mark loci of genes involved in the tumor development. However, we have identified loss of chromosome 2, 10, 13, 17 and 21 as discriminating alteration between chromophobe RCCs and ROs. Therefore, detection of these chromosomal changes can be used for the accurate diagnosis in routine histology.

Highlights

  • The diagnosis of benign renal oncocytomas (RO) and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (RCC) based on their morphology remains uncertain in several cases

  • Taking all chromosomal losses into account, chromophobe RCCs in this series are characterised by loss of 5 to 13 chromosomes leading to low chromosome number

  • A quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the genes BUB1 and CLDN8 in 19 chromophobe RCCs and 29 ROs did not revealed a correlation between copy number changes, e.g. loss of one allele and gene expression and

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The diagnosis of benign renal oncocytomas (RO) and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (RCC) based on their morphology remains uncertain in several cases. Renal oncocytomas (RO) and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (RCC) make up approximately 10% of renal cell tumors (RCT). We have detected complex losses of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17 and 21 in 70%–90% of the chromophobe RCCs by karyotyping, chromosomal CGH and microsatellite analysis [6,7,8,9]. The lack of genetic changes specific for other types of RCTs combined with the histological characteristics may be helpful in the diagnosis of RO [13,14]. The complex genetic alterations occurring in conventional, chromophobe or papillary RCCs can be used for differential diagnosis of "unclassified" RCTs by karyotyping, microsatellites and BAC-array technologies [15,16,17]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.