Abstract

This article demonstrates that the passive coping strategies utilized among Chinese police, prosecutors and judges could partly account for the high rates of prosecution and conviction in China. Passive coping strategies are defined as inactive tactics employed to avoid disagreements and conflicts among people or institutions. After a brief introduction, a review of the relevant statistic rates is offered, which indicates that both the prosecution and conviction rates remain persistently high. Next, an outline and evaluation of the formal intra-institutional relationships between the criminal authorities are offered. After that, a detailed account of the application of case dismissal tactics, a type of passive coping strategy, to the legal decision-making process is demonstrated. Finally, this article concludes with a discussion of the pros and cons of the use of passive coping strategies in the decisions to prosecute and convict, and offers some legislative recommendations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.