Abstract

ObjectivesOur aim was to investigate usefulness of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for predicting poor response to intravenous rtPA in white Caucasian ischemic stroke patients treated within 4.5 hours from the onset. Materials and methodsThis retrospective analysis included all consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients (N = 344) treated with rtPA in a tertiary stroke center from 2011 to 2017. NLR was calculated from complete blood counts obtained on admission. The patients were classified into NLR terciles (T1 <1.75, T2<2.97, T3≥2.97). Significant neurological improvement was defined as an 8-point reduction in the NIHSS score or reaching the score of 0 to 1. ResultsCompared to NLR T1, patients from NLR T3 were significantly older, more often disabled before stroke, and had longer onset-to-needle time. They less often achieved neurological improvement at day 7 (38% vs 59% p=0.002) and had higher 90-day mortality (27% vs 13%, p=0.020), with no differences in neurological improvement at 24 hours, occurrence of sICH and 7–day mortality. Each additional 4 units of NLR decreased unadjusted and adjusted odds for achieving favorable outcome at day 7 (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.92; aOR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39-1.00), and increased the odds for death at 3 months (OR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.15-2.24; aOR 1.82, 95% CI:1.14-2.92) ConclusionsHigh NLR can predict poor response to intravenous rtPA in Caucasian patients with acute ischemic stroke, especially in terms of not achieving significant neurological improvement at day 7 and death at day 90. It encourages attempts to incorporate NLR in already validated scores.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.