Abstract

AbstractPost‐release mortality and movements are critical factors of translocation failure. Yet, survival and movement reflect different demographic and behavioral processes and may therefore have contrasted responses to management, although they are often very difficult to disentangle in animal populations. To provide guidance in animal translocations, we discriminated the respective roles of survival and movement in the long‐term dynamic of a translocated metapopulation of Cinereous vultures (Aegypius monachus) in France using multievent capture–recapture analyses of reintroduced (n = 119) and wild‐born individual (n = 163) observations. Annual apparent survival rates were high and structured in age (>0.8 for young and >0.9 for adults) and did not differ between individual origin (wild‐born or released), release methods (aviary or hacking) nor between regions (Alps and Causses), except for those released in the Alps experiencing a reduced survival for one year after release. In contrast, age structure movements differed between populations and origin status. Wild‐born young from the Causses were more erratic than those from the Alps and older individuals, whereas vultures reintroduced in the Causses demonstrated restricted movements during their first year after release. Despite such asymmetric movements, we overall highlight a strong tropism of individuals whatever the region and their origin. Since movement and survival were respectively higher and lower in young compared with adults, we recommend to first release adults in the primary stage of metapopulation translocations for increasing the establishment success at the release site. Further releasing young and securing successful breeding into the wild would increase demographic growth and between‐population connections.

Highlights

  • Reintroductions are critical recovery measures to counter biodiversity loss by aiming at reestablishing viable populations over the long term (IUCN/SSC, 2013; Sarrazin and Barbault, 1996; Seddon et al, 2014)

  • Reintroduction outcomes depend on various factors affecting the different phases of reintroduced population dynamic across time-scales: establishment, growth and regulation phase (Sarrazin, 2007)

  • Based on frequent movements detected in our dataset between Baronnies and Verdon, and given very similar habitat conditions at both alpine sites, we further considered the outcome of the two Alpine reintroductions as a single functional demographic population in our analysis from both biological and methodological reasons

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reintroductions are critical recovery measures to counter biodiversity loss by aiming at reestablishing viable populations over the long term (IUCN/SSC, 2013; Sarrazin and Barbault, 1996; Seddon et al, 2014). Reintroduction outcomes depend on various factors affecting the different phases of reintroduced population dynamic across time-scales: establishment, growth and regulation phase (Sarrazin, 2007). Reintroduction contributes successfully to species recovery only once reintroduced population has reached the regulation phase (Robert et al, 2015), intermediate progress assessments are crucial for adaptive management (Armstrong and Seddon, 2008; Parker et al, 2013; Sarrazin, 2007). Intense dispersal of released individuals within a metapopulation network can lead to local reintroduction failure while reinforcing newly established or remnant population at regional scale (Le Gouar et al, 2008; Mihoub et al, 2011). Metapopulation restoration is challenging in highly mobile species

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call