Abstract

BackgroundFluctuating asymmetry (FA), defined as small random deviations from the ideal bilateral symmetry, has been hypothesized to increase in response to both genetic and environmental stress experienced by a population. We compared levels of FA in 12 bilateral meristic traits (viz. lateral-line system neuromasts and lateral plates), and heterozygosity in 23 microsatellite loci, among four marine (high piscine predation risk) and four pond (zero piscine predation risk) populations of nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius).ResultsPond sticklebacks had on average three times higher levels of FA than marine fish and this difference was highly significant. Heterozygosity in microsatellite markers was on average two times lower in pond (HE ≈ 0.3) than in marine (HE ≈ 0.6) populations, and levels of FA and heterozygosity were negatively correlated across populations. However, after controlling for habitat effect on heterozygosity, levels of FA and heterozygosity were uncorrelated.ConclusionsThe fact that levels of FA in traits likely to be important in the context of predator evasion were elevated in ponds compared to marine populations suggests that relaxed selection for homeostasis in ponds lacking predatory fish may be responsible for the observed habitat difference in levels of FA. This inference also aligns with the observation that the levels of genetic variability across the populations did not explain population differences in levels of FA after correcting for habitat effect. Hence, while differences in strength of selection, rather than in the degree of genetic stress could be argued to explain habitat differences in levels of FA, the hypothesis that increased FA in ponds is caused by genetic stress cannot be rejected.

Highlights

  • Fluctuating asymmetry (FA), defined as small random deviations from the ideal bilateral symmetry, has been hypothesized to increase in response to both genetic and environmental stress experienced by a population

  • Three types of asymmetry in bilateral characters have been recognized: directional asymmetry, antisymmetry, and fluctuating asymmetry (FA) [1]. While both directional asymmetry and antisymmetry result from normal development, FA refers to subtle random deviations from perfect symmetry in bilateral traits resulting from developmental perturbations, and is often used as an indicator of stress and/or fitness e.g. [2,3,4,5,6,7]

  • Numerous analytical and statistical issues, such as the proper control of measurement error in metric traits e.g. [21,22,23], and the difficulty of reliably estimating developmental instability (DI) using single traits [6,7,23,24], might provide at least partial explanation for the conflicting results. These difficulties have been proposed to account for the recent decrease in popularity of FA studies [6]. While both theory and a number of observations align with the idea that the degree of FA at the individual or population level is indicative of individual quality or degree of stress experienced, relaxed selection against developmental perturbations is expected to increase FA in given population and/or trait

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fluctuating asymmetry (FA), defined as small random deviations from the ideal bilateral symmetry, has been hypothesized to increase in response to both genetic and environmental stress experienced by a population. Three types of asymmetry in bilateral characters have been recognized: directional asymmetry, antisymmetry, and fluctuating asymmetry (FA) [1] While both directional asymmetry (the same side is consistently larger) and antisymmetry (one of the sides is consistently larger) result from normal development, FA refers to subtle random deviations from perfect symmetry in bilateral traits resulting from developmental perturbations, and is often used as an indicator of stress and/or fitness e.g. To the best of our knowledge, this hypothesis has not been tested to date

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call