High honeybee abundances reduce wild bee abundances on flowers in the city of Munich

Susanne S Renner,Helen Krause,Marie Sophie Graf,Zoe Hentschel,Andreas Fleischmann

doi:10.1007/s00442-021-04862-6

Susanne S Renner, Helen Krause + Show 3 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04862-6

Copy DOI

Abstract

The increase in managed honeybees (Apis mellifera) in many European cities has unknown effects on the densities of wild bees through competition. To investigate this, we monitored honeybees and non-honeybees from 01 April to 31 July 2019 and 2020 at 29 species of plants representing diverse taxonomic and floral-functional types in a large urban garden in the city of Munich in which the same plant species were cultivated in both years. No bee hives were present in the focal garden, and all bee hives in the adjacent area were closely monitored by interviewing the relevant bee keepers in both 2019 and 2020. Honeybee numbers were similar in April of both years, but increased from May to July 2020 compared to 2019. The higher densities correlated with a significant increase in shifts from wild bee to honeybee visits in May/June/July, while visitor spectra in April 2019 and 2020 remained the same. Most of the species that experienced a shift to honeybee visits in 2020 were visited mostly or exclusively for their nectar. There were no shifts towards increased wild bee visits in any species. These results from a flower-rich garden have implications for the discussion of whether urban bee keeping might negatively impact wild bees. We found clear support that high honeybee densities result in exploitative competition at numerous types of flowers.

Highlights

It is notoriously difficult to provide unambiguous evidence of competition, in mobile organisms (Goulson 2003)
The question is difficult to answer, because the European dark honeybee (Apis mellifera mellifera) is a native European species that has coexisted with European wild bee species for thousands of years (Dams 1978) during which time both groups simultaneously had to cope with numerous changes in flower abundances and local climate
The focal plants represented different taxonomic and floral-functional types (Fig. 1), including native species and horticultural forms, species adapted to bee pollination as well as species pollinated by other insects, such as flies and butterflies, in their native habitats (e.g., Hyacinthus) or species in areas naturally devoid of honeybees (e.g., New World Dahlia, Echinacea, and Mahonia aquifolium)

Summary

Introduction

It is notoriously difficult to provide unambiguous evidence of competition, in mobile organisms (Goulson 2003). Because of this there is no clear agreement whether increased honeybee densities have a negative impact on wild bee diversity or abundance via exploitative competition for nectar and pollen (Gunnarsson and Federsel 2014; Lindström et al 2016; Geslin 2017; Mallinger et al 2017; Wojcik et al 2018). The new role of cities as refugia for wild bees raises the question whether the current increase in urban honeybee keeping (Lorenz and Stark 2015) might negatively impact wild bees in cities by depleting their nectar and/or pollen resources. To detect significant ongoing changes in foraging competition between honeybees and wild bees, data are required from settings in which the abundances of honeybees change, but those of floral resources and wild bee nesting sites do not

Methods

Results

Conclusion