Abstract

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy may be better tolerated than traditional non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and is rapidly gaining acceptance in pediatric acute care. In Israel, HFNC is approved for domestic use. We aim to describe its indications, efficacy, parental satisfaction and safety. Retrospective study of children treated with home HFNC therapy in three pediatric centers. Data included demographic parameters, indication of use, weight and days of hospitalization before and after initiation. Safety, tolerability and parental satisfaction were assessed via standardized telephone questionnaire. Median (IQR) age of initiating home HFNC in 75 children was 8.3 (2.2, 29.6) months. Indications were obstructive sleep apnea (33; 44%), airway malacia (19; 25%), chronic lung disease (15; 20%), neuromuscular disease (4; 5%) and post-extubation support (4; 5%). Weight standard deviation score rose from -2.3 pre HFNC to -1.7 at 6.7 months post HFNC initiation, p<0.001. Hospital admission days during the two months pre vs post HFNC initiation were 22 (5.5, 60) and 5 (0, 14.7) respectively, p<0.008. Median (IQR) parental satisfaction score was 5/5 (4, 5). Fifty of 60 (83%) respondents would recommend home HFNC to other families in a similar situation. There were no serious adverse events. In our population, domestic HFNC appeared safe and well tolerated for a variety of indications. Its introduction was associated with improved weight gain, fewer hospitalization days and high parental satisfaction. Further work is required to characterize groups of children most likely to benefit from HFNC, as opposed to traditional modes of NIV. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call