High-Flow Nasal Cannula Reduces Effort of Breathing But Not Consistently via Positive End-Expiratory Pressure

Abstract

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy reduces the effort of breathing in patients with bronchiolitis, but the mechanisms are not understood. Theorized mechanisms include dead space washout and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) application. What are the mechanisms of action of HFNC therapy in patients with bronchiolitis? Prospective, single-center study of children 3 years of age or younger with bronchiolitis from January 2020 through March 2021. Flow was titrated between 0.5 and 2 L/kg/min. Electrical impedance tomography measured end-expiratory lung impedance (EELZ) change as an end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) change surrogate and change in tidal impedance difference (ΔZ) as a tidal volume (VT) surrogate. A subset showed manometry measuring esophageal pressure change (ΔPes; transpulmonary pressure surrogate) and pressure rate product (PRP; effort of breathing metric). We hypothesized that EELV and VT would not change and that effort would reduce via respiratory rate (not ΔPes). Measurements were reported as the difference from 0.5 L/kg/min. We studied 22 patients in total, 10 with esophageal manometry. Median EELZ increased by 0.36 arbitrary unit (AU), 2.42 AU, and 4.8 AU at 1 L/kg/min, 1.5 L/kg/min, and 2 L/kg/min (P= .01, 2 L/kg/min vs0.5 L/kg/min), which corresponded to a median increase in EELV of 1.8mL/kg between 0.5 and 2 L/kg/min. Seven patients showed an increase in EELZ of > 5 AU, 12 showed no change in EELZ (± 5 AU), and three showed a decrease in EELZ of > 5 AU. ΔZ (ie, VT) did not change from 0.5 L/kg/min to 2 L/kg/min (median change, 0.29 AU; P= .48). Median PRP decreased by 78cm H2O/min from 0.5 L/kg/min to 2 L/kg/min (P= .02), with all patients demonstrating a reduction in PRP, with a nonsignificant change in ΔPes (P= .68). Increasing HFNC in children with bronchiolitis reduces the effort of breathing, but no consistent increase occurs in end-expiratory lung volume and no significant change occurs in VT or transpulmonary pressure. This suggests that PEEP application is not the primary mechanism of action of HFNC in children with bronchiolitis.