Abstract
Background Extubation failure is associated with increased morbidity and poor outcomes. This study aimed to ascertain the effectiveness of a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as a weaning method compared to conventional weaning. Methodology A total of 60 mechanically ventilated patients, aged 18-65 years, who were ventilated for 48 hours and whose underlying pathology had either resolved or was improving, were enrolled in this study. They were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to participate in the HFNC weaning method or receive conventional weaning. Patients in Group A were extubated and oxygen was provided via HFNC. Group B patients were given a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) per the standard protocol and extubated after a successful SBT. Results Weaning failure was found in five patients and was higher in the conventional group (three patients in the conventional group and two patients in the HFNC group). The duration of stay of patients in intensive care units was significantly higher in the conventional group than in the HFNC group. Conclusions HFNC is a better alternative to conventional weaning through SBT.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
