Abstract

To compare the outcomes of localized prostate cancer treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), we examined 924 patients treated with HDR-BT + external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and 500 patients treated with LDR-BT ± EBRT using multi-institutional retrospective data. The HDR-BT treated advanced disease with more hormonal therapy than LDR-BT. To reduce background selection bias, we performed inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis using propensity scores and excluded patients with T3b-4 disease/ initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels > 50 ng/ml. The actuarial 5-year biochemical control rates (5y-bNED) were 96.3% and 95.7% in the HDR-BT and LDR-BT groups, respectively. The corresponding values were 100% and 96.5% in the low-risk group; 97.4% and 97.1% in the intermediate-risk group (97.2% and 97% in the higher titer group and 97.5% and 94.6% in the lower titer group, respectively); and 95.7% and 94.9% in the selected high-risk group, respectively. IPTW correction indicated no significant difference among the groups. The 5y-bNED in the HDR-BT + EBRT, LDR-BT + EBRT, and LDR-BT alone groups were 96.3%, 95.5%, and 97%, respectively (P = 0.3011). The corresponding values were 97.4%, 94.7%, and 96.6% (P = 0.1004) in the intermediate-risk group (97.5%, 100%, and 94.5% in the lower titer group [P = 0.122] and 97.2%, 96.2%, and 100% [P = 0.664] in the higher titer group, respectively) and 95.7%, 95.5%, and 100% (P = 0.859) in the high-risk group, respectively. The HDR-BT group showed a lower incidence of acute grade ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicities; the incidence of other early and late grade ≥ 2 toxicities were similar between the HDR-BT and LDR-BT groups. Acute genitourinary toxicity predicted the occurrence of late genitourinary toxicity. EBRT increased the risk of grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal toxicity. HDR-BT + EBRT is a good alternative to LDR-BT ± EBRT for low-, intermediate-, and selected high-risk patients.

Highlights

  • Temporary implant BT or high-dose-rate (HDR) ­BT1

  • Compared to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), BT delivers higher doses of radiation to the target lesion without excessive irradiation of the adjacent organs; it is considered to be one of the best radiotherapy ­options[2]. It can ameliorate biochemical control as it delivers the highest biological equivalent dose compared to all other radiotherapy options

  • In the ASCENDE-RT trial, LDR-BT + EBRT led to improved biochemical control compared to EBRT (78 Gy)[4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Compared to EBRT, BT delivers higher doses of radiation to the target lesion without excessive irradiation of the adjacent organs; it is considered to be one of the best radiotherapy ­options[2]. It can ameliorate biochemical control as it delivers the highest biological equivalent dose compared to all other radiotherapy options. LDR-BT was used as a boost to EBRT in patients with intermediate-to-high-risk disease, and outcomes were i­mproved[1,2,3]. HDR-BT can be used as a boost for EBRT (HDR-BT + EBRT) in patients with intermediate-1,3 and intermediate-to-high-risk prostate c­ ancer[1]. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of HDR-BT with EBRT versus LDR-BT ± EBRT

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call