High dose bolus (HDB) interleukin-2 (IL2) and concurrent low dose ipilimumab followed sequentially by nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma after failure of anti-PD1-based immunotherapy and BRAF-MEK inhibition.

Abstract

9543 Background: Options are limited for patients with advanced metastatic melanoma who have disease progression following anti-PD1-based immunotherapy and BRAF-MEK inhibition (if BRAF V600 mutant). Evidence supports synergism between IL2 and CTLA4 blockade in enhancing the immunogenicity of the tumor microenvironment and therapeutic susceptibility to PD1 blockade. Methods: We conducted a phase II study of HDB IL2 in combination with LD ipilimumab followed sequentially by nivolumab in patients with advanced inoperable stage III or stage IV melanoma with progression after anti-PD1-based immunotherapy and BRAF-MEK inhibitors. Treatment consisted of up to 3 courses (One cycle is 21 days and one course is 4 cycles). HDB IL2 and concurrent ipilimumab 1 mg/kg were given during week 1 of the initial 2 cycles of each course. Nivolumab was given during week one of the 3rd cycle of each course. Patients without evidence of disease progression (RECIST v.1.1) or limiting toxicities (CTCAE v.5) were offered additional courses of treatment. A Simon two-stage minimax design (Simon, 1989) was followed. We report the outcomes for Stage I. Results: 12 pts (5 female, 7 male) with metastatic melanoma (2M1a, 1M1b, 6M1c, 3M1d) were treated. Median age 53 years (33 – 69), 11 cutaneous (including 1 acral) and 1 mucosal primary. Tumor mutation status: 4BRAF (V600E), 2NRAS (p.Q61K), 1NF1. The median number of prior regimens for metastatic melanoma was 3 (range 1 - 5). Eight patients previously received ipilimumab as monotherapy or in combination with anti-PD1. On study, the median number of doses of IL2 was 9 during cycle 1 and 7 during cycle 2. A median of 2 doses of ipilimumab and 1 dose of nivolumab were given as part of the combination regimen. Among the 11 evaluable patients (completed 1 course of systemic therapy), the response rate was 2/11 (18.2 %; 95% CI: 2.3% – 51.8%); 1CR, 1 PR, 5 SD, 4 PD and 1 NE as best response. After a median follow up of 39 months, both responses are ongoing (at 10+ and 37+ months), median progression free survival (PFS) was 3 months and median overall survival (OS) was 18.8 months. One-year PFS and OS were 17% (95% CI: 4.7% - 59%) and 83% (95% CI: 65% - 100%), respectively. The adverse event profile was consistent with the expected toxicity profile for each agent with no increase in frequency with the combination. Conclusions: Our combination regimen was relatively safe and well tolerated and demonstrated promising efficacy in a heavily pretreated patient population passing the prespecified efficacy criteria for Simon Stage I. The study has moved into Stage II testing. Clinical trial information: NCT04562129 .