Abstract

In the last years, additive manufacturing (AM) has turned into an emerging technology and an increasing number of classes of material powders are now available for this manufacturing process. For large-scale adoption, an accurate knowledge of the mechanical behaviour of the resulting materials is fundamental, also considering that reliable data are often lacking and dedicated standards are still missing for these AM alloys. In this regard, the aim of the present work is to characterize both the high-cycle-fatigue (HFC) and the low-cycle-fatigue (LCF) behaviour of AM 17–4 PH stainless steel (SS). To better understand the performance of the selected alloy, four series of cylindrical samples were manufactured. Three series were produced via selective laser melting (SLM), better known as laser-based powder bed fusion of metals technology using an EOS M280 machine. The first series was tested in the as-built condition, the second was machined before testing to obtain a better surface finishing, while the third series was post-processed via hot isostatic pressing (HIP). Finally, a fourth series of samples was produced from the wrought 17–4 PH material counterpart, for comparison. The understanding and assessment of the influence of surface finishing on the fatigue behaviour of AM materials are fundamental, considering that in most applications the AM parts may present reticular or lattice structures, internal cavities or complex geometries, which must be set into operation in the as-built conditions, since a surface finishing postprocess is not convenient or not feasible at all. On the other side, a HIP process is often suggested to reduce the internal porosities and, therefore, to improve the resulting mechanical properties. The high-cycle-fatigue limits were obtained with a short staircase approach according to the Dixon statistical method. The maximum number of cycles (run-out) was set equal to 50,00,000. The part of the Wöhler diagram relative to finite life was also characterized by means of additional tests at higher stress levels. On the other side, the low-cycle tests allowed to tune the Ramberg–Osgood cyclic curves and the Basquin–Coffin–Manson LCF curves. The results obtained for the four different series of specimens permitted to quantify the reduction of the mechanical performance due to the actual limits of the laser-based powder bed fusion technology (surface quality, internal porosity, different solidification) with respect to traditional manufacturing and could be used to improve design safety and reliability, granting structural integrity of actual applications under elastic and elasto-plastic fatigue loads.

Highlights

  • Laser-sintered 17–4 PH stainless steel (SS) is a material showing a very good corrosion resistance and high strength guaranteed by its martensitic structure [1]

  • While several scholars claim that this treatment can improve the fatigue performances by reducing the internal porosities, the actual data show a reduction of the fatigue limit of about 12% in the presence of the hot isostatic pressing (HIP) process, instead

  • Four series of samples made of 17–4PHSS were produced, tested and characterized in the high- and in the low-cycle-fatigue range

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Laser-sintered 17–4 PH stainless steel (SS) is a material showing a very good corrosion resistance and high strength guaranteed by its martensitic structure [1]. The high speeds of solidification during the laser-based powder bed fusion process, prevents the formation of the martensite phase in the as-built material leading to a metastable austenitic microstructure. Another feature to be pointed out is that the characteristic porosity which comes from the production process can impact the mechanical properties of the material [3]. Contradictory results regarding the effectiveness of the HIP process on AM 17–4 PH SS are present in literature [8, 9] For this reason, having specific and reliable high-fatigue data are fundamental to identify the limits of AM materials

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call