Abstract

The rapidity-dependent jet veto observables {mathcal{T}}_{Bj} and {mathcal{T}}_{Cj} provide a tight jet veto at central rapidity, gradually transitioning to a loose veto at forward rapidities. They divide the phase space into exclusive jet bins in a different way to the traditional jet veto observable pT j, and are advantageous to use under harsh pile-up conditions. We obtain predictions for the 0-jet gluon-fusion (ggF) Higgs cross section using both of these veto observables at NNLL′+NNLO, and compare these predictions to the prior state-of-the-art of NLL′+NLO. A significant reduction in perturbative uncertainty is observed going from NLL′+NLO to NNLL′+NNLO, with the NNLL′+NNLO predictions lying inside the uncertainty band of the NLL′+NLO predictions. We also investigate the relative sensitivities of ggF Higgs cross sections with {mathcal{T}}_{Bj} , {mathcal{T}}_{Cj} and pT j jet vetoes to underlying event and hadronisation effects using an NLO+parton shower calculation. We find that the cross sections with {mathcal{T}}_{Bj} and {mathcal{T}}_{Cj} vetoes have a reduced sensitivity to underlying event and hadronisation effects compared to that with a pT j veto.

Highlights

  • Where yj the rapidity of the jet and Y the rapidity of the Higgs

  • A significant reduction in perturbative uncertainty is observed going from NLL +NLO to NNLL +NNLO, with the NNLL +NNLO predictions lying inside the uncertainty band of the NLL +NLO predictions

  • We investigate the relative sensitivities of ggF Higgs cross sections with TBj, TCj and pT j jet vetoes to underlying event and hadronisation effects using an NLO+parton shower calculation

Read more

Summary

Profile scales and perturbative uncertainties

We discuss how we choose the beam and soft scales as a function of T cut, which, following a standard convention for SCET computations, we refer to as the profile scales [54, 55]. At large T cut this reproduces the fixed-order scale variation uncertainty in the total inclusive cross section. Comparing the results with rs = 2 to those with rs = 1, we see a better convergence between different orders in resummed perturbation theory in the former case, where this is noticeable for TCj. In the case of TCj with rs = 1, one observes that the top of the uncertainty band at T cut ∼ 20 GeV greatly exceeds that of the total NNLO cross section. In the case of TCj with rs = 1, one observes that the top of the uncertainty band at T cut ∼ 20 GeV greatly exceeds that of the total NNLO cross section

Effect of underlying event and hadronisation
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call