Abstract
Multimodal multiobjective problems (MMOPs) commonly arise in real-world situations where distant solutions in decision space share a very similar objective value. Traditional multimodal multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MMEAs) prefer to pursue multiple Pareto solutions that have the same objective values. However, a more practical situation in engineering problems is that one solution is slightly worse than another in terms of objective values, while the solutions are far away in the decision space. In other words, such problems have global and local Pareto fronts (PFs). In this study, we proposed several benchmark problems with several local PFs. Then, we proposed an evolutionary algorithm with a hierarchy ranking method (HREA) to find both the global and the local PFs based on the decision maker’s preference. Regarding HREA, we proposed a local convergence quality evaluation method to better maintain diversity in the decision space. Moreover, a hierarchy ranking method was introduced to update the convergence archive. The experimental results show that HREA is competitive compared with other state-of-the-art MMEAs for solving the chosen benchmark problems.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.