Abstract

In hyperspectral image (HSI) classification, the performance of supervised learning tends to be affected by priori knowledge, i.e., quantity and quality of samples. However, it is inevitable to limit the performance of supervised classification due to the presence of noisy labels in the training samples. In this article, we first propose a hierarchical constrained energy minimum (HCEM) method to detect mislabeled samples (noisy labels) of original training set trained with supervised task and boost the performance of classifiers and spectral-spatial classification methods in HSI applications. The basic idea behind this work is that the filter output energy of noisy label spectrum is hierarchically suppressed based on the cascade of CEM detectors at different layers. The proposed HCEM method consists of four key steps: First, the distance information among samples is obtained to calculate the spectral similarity between samples per class in original training set. Then, the confidence spectra per class is constructed according to the maximum similarity domain. Next, the spectra of mislabeled samples is suppressed and the spectra of true samples is preserved by multilayers CEM detector. Finally, the noisy labels are detected and removed based on the output evaluated by the proposed HCEM method. Experimental results on four real hyperspectral datasets are verified by a series of spectral classifiers and spectral-spatial classification methods, it demonstrated that the proposed HCEM method, can accurately remove noisy labels of original training set and effectively improve the performance of supervised classification task.

Highlights

  • W ITH the increasing development of remote sensing technology, the demands of treatment to the numerous data obtained by sensor are higher and higher

  • We initially introduce a hierarchical structurebased constrained energy minimization (CEM) (HCEM) method to detect mislabeled samples of original training set trained with supervised task and improve the effectiveness of classifiers and spectral-spatial classification methods in hyperspectral image (HSI) processing

  • The hierarchical structure based constrained energy minimum method is introduced for the first time in a noisy label detection framework for HSI supervised classification, which consists of three major components: 1) construction of confidence spectrum; 2) description of hierarchical structure based CEM; and 3) cleanse the training set with noisy labels

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

W ITH the increasing development of remote sensing technology, the demands of treatment to the numerous data obtained by sensor are higher and higher. Kang et al [27] combined the mechanism and reasons that may generate the noisy labels in supervised task of HSI classification for the first time, and developed detection and correction of mislabeled training samples method based on the edge-preserving filtering (EPF) and spectral constraints. The sufficient experimental results show that the DP-based detection methods can effectively remove noisy labels of original training set and promote classification accuracy of supervised task. In [34], a kernel entropy component analysis (KECA) based method is proposed to remove noisy labels of a training set with mislabeled samples and improve performance of supervised classification. We initially introduce a hierarchical structurebased CEM (HCEM) method to detect mislabeled samples (noisy labels) of original training set trained with supervised task and improve the effectiveness of classifiers and spectral-spatial classification methods in HSI processing.

Spectral Similarity Metrics
Constrained Energy Minimum
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED APPROACH
Construction of Confidence Spectrum
Description of Hierarchical Structure-Based CEM
Cleanse the Training Set With Noisy Labels
THEORY-BASED PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED HCEM METHOD
Experimental Setup
Analysis of the Influence of Spectral Similarity Metrics
Analysis of the Influence of the Parameters
Evaluation of Detection Performance
Performance Verification With SVM Classifier
METHODS
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.