Abstract

Hierarchical organizations of information processing in the brain networks have been known to exist and widely studied. To find proper hierarchical structures in the macaque brain, the traditional methods need the entire pairwise hierarchical relationships between cortical areas. In this paper, we present a new method that discovers hierarchical structures of macaque brain networks by using partial information of pairwise hierarchical relationships. Our method uses a graph-based manifold learning to exploit inherent relationship, and computes pseudo distances of hierarchical levels for every pair of cortical areas. Then, we compute hierarchy levels of all cortical areas by minimizing the sum of squared hierarchical distance errors with the hierarchical information of few cortical areas. We evaluate our method on the macaque brain data sets whose true hierarchical levels are known as the FV91 model. The experimental results show that hierarchy levels computed by our method are similar to the FV91 model, and its errors are much smaller than the errors of hierarchical clustering approaches.

Highlights

  • Hierarchical organization in the brain networks has been known to enable the efficient processing of information to support complex brain functions, and it has been studied in various ways to understand structural and functional brain networks [1, 2]

  • We report the experimental results on the macaque brain data sets whose true hierarchical levels are known as FV91 model

  • We suggested a new framework that compute the hierarchy orders of cortical areas in the macaque brain by using partial pairwise hierarchical relationships

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hierarchical organization in the brain networks has been known to enable the efficient processing of information to support complex brain functions, and it has been studied in various ways to understand structural and functional brain networks [1, 2]. Most of the work can be roughly categorized into the following two types of approaches: finding hierarchical modularity in the brain [3,4,5,6,7], and hierarchical ordering of cortical areas in the brain [8,9,10,11,12,13,14] The former computes a hierarchy of modules by partitioning the organization into submodules without using pairwise hierarchical relationships, but the result may not reflect the information flow in the brain. Whereas the latter computes hierarchy levels of cortical areas which successfully reflect the information flow, but it needs pairwise hierarchical relationships.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call