Abstract

Previous studies for enumerating fungal communities on pine needles relied entirely on phenotypic diversity (microscopy) or identification based on DNA sequence data from those taxa recovered via cultural studies. To bypass limitations of the culturing methods and provide a more realistic diversity estimate, we employed and assessed a PCR-DGGE based method coupled with rDNA phylogenetic sequence analyses to characterize fungal taxa associated with pine needles. Fresh (living) and decayed needles from three hosts of the Pinaceae (Keteleeria fortunei, Pinus elliottii and P. massoniana) were examined. Morphological studies reveal that the most abundant species associated with decayed needles were Cladosporium cladosporioides and an unidentified Trichoderma species followed by Gliocephalotrichum sp., Gliocladium sp., Lophodermium pinastri, Paecilomyces varioti, Phaeostalagmus cyclosporus and a Phoma sp, which are commonly occurring fungi. Community genomic data from freshly collected and decayed pine needles recovered 40 operational taxonomic units, which appear to be mostly undetected members of the natural fungal consortium. Sequence analyses revealed a number of phylotypes or “species” that were not recovered using traditional morphological and cultural approaches previously used. Phylogenetic data from partial 18S rDNA sequence data reveal that most phylotypes represent potential novel phylogenetic fungal lineages with affinities to the Dothideomycetes, Leotiomycetes, Lecanoromycetes and Sordariomycetes and were not identical to previously known endophytes or saprobes. Although the major ecological roles of these phylotypes in pine needles are still enigmatic, this study provides new insights in hidden fungal diversity that mycologists are possibly ignoring given the discrepancies associated with available methods. To what extent do previously recovered identified species (either as saprobes or endophytes) from morphological or culturing studies act as pioneer decomposers or constitute an integral part of endophytic community warrants further investigation.

Highlights

  • Previous studies for enumerating fungal communities on pine needles relied entirely on phenotypic diversity or identification based on DNA sequence data from those taxa recovered via cultural studies

  • Studies have revealed that dominant microorganisms isolated from environmental samples using traditional and cultivation-dependent methodology are genetically different from those identified via DGGE analysis of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene (e.g.18)

  • Lophodermium pinastri has the highest frequency of occurrence among the three ascomycetes present

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Previous studies for enumerating fungal communities on pine needles relied entirely on phenotypic diversity (microscopy) or identification based on DNA sequence data from those taxa recovered via cultural studies. Documenting fungal diversity, rely mostly on taxonomic identification of species based on spore morphology and DNA sequence data of endophytes from cultural dependent methods This has a major drawback given that not all fungi grow readily in highly selective medium and sporulation is dependent on species, host, seasonality, growth conditions, and other environmental factors which can largely underestimate diversity. Diversity of freshwater fungi in decaying leaves of white birch (Betula papayrifera), several maple species (Acer rubrum, A. saccharum, and A. spicatum) and white spruce (Picea glauca) has been reported using a traditional and a molecular approach[19] They found that species richness estimates based on DGGE are higher than those from T-RFLP analysis and much higher than those based on spore identification. DGGE has been valuable in profiling fungal taxa that are associated with healthy and infected black spruce seedlings (Picea marina)[22]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.