Abstract
Individuals cope with stress using multiple strategies, yet studies of coping profiles are rare. We draw data from a longitudinal study of Australian men (n = 272; 30–37 years), assessed before (T1) and during (T2) a nation-wide COVID-19 lockdown. We aimed to: (1) identify men's multi-strategy coping profiles before and during the pandemic; (2) assess cross-sectional (T1-T1, T2-T2) and prospective (T1-T2) associations between profiles and symptoms of psychological distress (stress, anxiety, depression, and anger); and (3) examine relationships between coping profiles and appraisals of pandemic-related stressors and options for coping. In latent profile analyses of 14 coping strategies, three profiles emerged that were largely consistent across T1 and T2: (1) Relaxed Copers (low use of all strategies), (2) Approach Copers, and (3) Dual Copers (high avoidant and moderate-high approach-oriented strategies). Compared to Relaxed and Approach Copers, men who were Dual Copers had elevated psychological distress cross-sectionally before (T1) and during (T2) the pandemic, but not prospectively. Post hoc analyses suggested this was because many men changed coping profiles in the context of the pandemic. Men with stable (T1-T2) or new (T2 only) Dual Coping profiles experienced greater psychological distress and more negative appraisals of pandemic stressors and options for coping. In sum, at the sample level, the composition of men's coping profiles and associations with mental health risk were relatively stable over time and contexts; however, many men appeared to respond to pandemic conditions by changing coping profile groups, with mostly positive mental health outcomes. Of concern were men who adopted more avoidant strategies (e.g., denial, self-distraction, disengagement, substance use, and self-blame) under pandemic conditions. These Dual Coper men also engaged in commonly observable approach-oriented behaviours (e.g., planning, active coping, humour, seeking practical social support) that may mask their vulnerability to mental health risk. Our findings highlight the clinical importance of enquiring about escalating or frequent avoidant coping even in the presence of more active and interactive approach-oriented behaviours.
Highlights
Coping refers to cognitive and behavioural efforts to manage stressful situations or their implications [(1), p. 223]
We examined whether the stability of coping profiles may help explain the negligible prospective association, after adjustment, between T1 coping profiles and T2 psychological distress symptoms and coping appraisals during the pandemic
We found a minority of men increased their avoidant coping during the pandemic and reported coping appraisals and increased psychological distress on par with longer-term Stable Dual Copers
Summary
Coping refers to cognitive and behavioural efforts to manage stressful situations or their implications [(1), p. 223]. Coping refers to cognitive and behavioural efforts to manage stressful situations or their implications [(1), p. Maladaptive coping patterns are linked to vulnerability and maintenance of psychopathology [2, 3]. Prior research has predominantly taken variable-centred approaches that examine associations between individual coping strategies and mental health outcomes. Individual coping strategies are rarely used in isolation. Individual differences in the use of multiple strategies–referred to as coping repertoires or profiles–may more meaningfully reflect real-world responses to stress and vulnerability to psychopathology [4]. Little is known about coping profiles and their relevance to psychological distress within populations under stress
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
