Abstract

Security regulators charge firms with providing material information about intangible investments to outside investors. Among the many firms that do not report their advertising, 25% are in the top decile of observed advertising. We find that relying on managerial judgment for disclosure replaces transparent, regulatory thresholds, such as 1% of sales, with opaque, auditor-specific minimums (e.g., EY vs. Deloitte). Forced and voluntary auditor changes lead firms to alter advertising disclosures. Financial analysts ask executives of hidden advertising firms 65% fewer questions about advertising than their reporting peers. Our final tests demonstrate that hidden advertising is associated with stock mispricing.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call